<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Pro Photographer Tech (ProTogTech)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://protogtech.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://protogtech.com</link>
	<description>Technology &#38; Workflow for Pro Photographers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:51:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon 5d mark III &#124; Record Separately Vs. Record to Multiple &#124; Performance Comparison by 64GB Transcend SDXC Class 10 &#38; 400x CF Memory Cards &#171; Pro Photographer Tech (ProTogTech)</title>
		<link>http://protogtech.com/cameras/canon-5d-mark-iii-record-separately-vs-record-to-multiple-performance-comparison/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>64GB Transcend SDXC Class 10 &#38; 400x CF Memory Cards &#171; Pro Photographer Tech (ProTogTech)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 10:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protogtech.com/?p=81#comment-311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] *The Canon 5d mk III doesn&#039;t support the UHS-i spec, so while these cards function just fine in the camera, they provide no performance benefit.  Yes, it makes the camera slow.  No, there&#039;s nothing you can do about it.  If you like conspiracy theories, consider that Canon may have intentionally nerfed the 5d mk III so that you&#039;d have another reason to upgrade to the 1D-x.  Check out my article for more details on the performance impact of writing files to the SD card in the 5d mk III. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] *The Canon 5d mk III doesn&#039;t support the UHS-i spec, so while these cards function just fine in the camera, they provide no performance benefit.  Yes, it makes the camera slow.  No, there&#039;s nothing you can do about it.  If you like conspiracy theories, consider that Canon may have intentionally nerfed the 5d mk III so that you&#039;d have another reason to upgrade to the 1D-x.  Check out my article for more details on the performance impact of writing files to the SD card in the 5d mk III. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spyder 3 Pro &amp; Windows 8 by Damian Strain</title>
		<link>http://protogtech.com/monitors/spyder-3-pro-windows-8/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian Strain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 14:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protogtech.com/?p=141#comment-305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Gavin for your reply.  I have been to the nVidia site and downloaded drivers on their recommendation but the problem still persists.  Spyder3 elite will just not recognise my monitor.  It did perfectly in windows 7 using the same touchscreen so I can only assume the spyder software is not windows 8 compatible for 64 bit machines.

Thanks again

Damian]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Gavin for your reply.  I have been to the nVidia site and downloaded drivers on their recommendation but the problem still persists.  Spyder3 elite will just not recognise my monitor.  It did perfectly in windows 7 using the same touchscreen so I can only assume the spyder software is not windows 8 compatible for 64 bit machines.</p>
<p>Thanks again</p>
<p>Damian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spyder 3 Pro &amp; Windows 8 by Gavin</title>
		<link>http://protogtech.com/monitors/spyder-3-pro-windows-8/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protogtech.com/?p=141#comment-304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m glad it helped, Brian!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad it helped, Brian!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spyder 3 Pro &amp; Windows 8 by Gavin</title>
		<link>http://protogtech.com/monitors/spyder-3-pro-windows-8/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 20:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protogtech.com/?p=141#comment-303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Elite and Pro models are based on the same core software, if I remember correctly.  On the licensing screen, I just copy/pasted in the license I&#039;ve used all along and it worked fine.  The fact that you&#039;re getting an error about your video card drivers suggests that perhaps you should explore that direction a bit.  What video card do you have?  Are you using Windows Update to get the latest driver, or are you getting it directly from the chipset manufacturer (probably ATI/AMD or nVidia?)  Windows Update is well known for only providing very old, or minimal functionality drivers for video cards.

If you have an ATI/AMD video card, start here:
http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/Pages/index.aspx

If you have an nVidia video card, start here:
http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-us

Follow the steps on either one of those pages to get the latest drivers for Windows 8, and give it another go, Damian.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Elite and Pro models are based on the same core software, if I remember correctly.  On the licensing screen, I just copy/pasted in the license I&#8217;ve used all along and it worked fine.  The fact that you&#8217;re getting an error about your video card drivers suggests that perhaps you should explore that direction a bit.  What video card do you have?  Are you using Windows Update to get the latest driver, or are you getting it directly from the chipset manufacturer (probably ATI/AMD or nVidia?)  Windows Update is well known for only providing very old, or minimal functionality drivers for video cards.</p>
<p>If you have an ATI/AMD video card, start here:<br />
<a href="http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/Pages/index.aspx">http://support.amd.com/us/gpudownload/Pages/index.aspx</a></p>
<p>If you have an nVidia video card, start here:<br />
<a href="http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-us">http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-us</a></p>
<p>Follow the steps on either one of those pages to get the latest drivers for Windows 8, and give it another go, Damian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spyder 3 Pro &amp; Windows 8 by Damian Strain</title>
		<link>http://protogtech.com/monitors/spyder-3-pro-windows-8/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian Strain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 22:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protogtech.com/?p=141#comment-302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi
You&#039;re lucky.  I have Spyder 3 elite and using windows 8 pro and it won&#039;t even recognise my touchscreen computer/monitor even afte downloading the 4.0.2 software.  It won&#039;t even let me in to pay for the license.  It just states I need to update my video card drivers but these are all up to date after installing windows 8.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks

Damian]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
You&#8217;re lucky.  I have Spyder 3 elite and using windows 8 pro and it won&#8217;t even recognise my touchscreen computer/monitor even afte downloading the 4.0.2 software.  It won&#8217;t even let me in to pay for the license.  It just states I need to update my video card drivers but these are all up to date after installing windows 8.<br />
Any help would be appreciated.<br />
Thanks</p>
<p>Damian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Spyder 3 Pro &amp; Windows 8 by Brian</title>
		<link>http://protogtech.com/monitors/spyder-3-pro-windows-8/#comment-301</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 19:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protogtech.com/?p=141#comment-301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You have made my day!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have made my day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Problem with Red on HP&#8217;s Envy 15 by Gavin</title>
		<link>http://protogtech.com/laptops/the-problem-with-red-on-hps-envy-15/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 22:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protogtech.com/?p=22#comment-295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well said, Ian.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, Ian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Problem with Red on HP&#8217;s Envy 15 by Ian Bull</title>
		<link>http://protogtech.com/laptops/the-problem-with-red-on-hps-envy-15/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 04:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protogtech.com/?p=22#comment-294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wouldn&#039;t say I am awfully disappointed by the lack of ruby red. It is just not perfect. That was what I was hoping for. A laptop that totally satisfies. I am about 95% satisfied. I do feel though that HP has wronged me and everyone else who purchased this laptop. They lead us to believe in something which they did not carry through with. I happened to have known about the color issue and yet I believed in HP&#039;s claim that their software would fix the problem. So after being shortchanged by HP&#039;s design I now have to endure being lied to. This is what hurts a little - being slighted by a company. A small case of being double-crossed and a computer company running away with your money.
My girlfriend actually laughed at me for trusting a company&#039;s word. You&#039;d think I would have learnt by now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say I am awfully disappointed by the lack of ruby red. It is just not perfect. That was what I was hoping for. A laptop that totally satisfies. I am about 95% satisfied. I do feel though that HP has wronged me and everyone else who purchased this laptop. They lead us to believe in something which they did not carry through with. I happened to have known about the color issue and yet I believed in HP&#8217;s claim that their software would fix the problem. So after being shortchanged by HP&#8217;s design I now have to endure being lied to. This is what hurts a little &#8211; being slighted by a company. A small case of being double-crossed and a computer company running away with your money.<br />
My girlfriend actually laughed at me for trusting a company&#8217;s word. You&#8217;d think I would have learnt by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs EOS-1D X, Low Light / High ISO by Gavin</title>
		<link>http://protogtech.com/cameras/canon-eos-5d-mark-iii-vs-eos-1d-x-low-light-high-iso/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2012 06:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protogtech.com/?p=123#comment-289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I understand, Paul.  Ignorance is bliss, right?  Now I&#039;m rearranging money so I can get one of my own in the next couple of months.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand, Paul.  Ignorance is bliss, right?  Now I&#8217;m rearranging money so I can get one of my own in the next couple of months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Canon EOS 5D Mark III vs EOS-1D X, Low Light / High ISO by A Quick Color &#38; Noise Comparison: Canon EOS-1D X vs Canon EOS 5D Mark III &#124; Paolo Cervesato</title>
		<link>http://protogtech.com/cameras/canon-eos-5d-mark-iii-vs-eos-1d-x-low-light-high-iso/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>A Quick Color &#38; Noise Comparison: Canon EOS-1D X vs Canon EOS 5D Mark III &#124; Paolo Cervesato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 23:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://protogtech.com/?p=123#comment-288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Source: [PPT] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: [PPT] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
